Tuesday, November 22, 2005

bookmark: connotea :: del.icio.us ::digg ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo::

Bio-IT World W3C Forms Life Science Semantic Web Group

"Specifically, the Semantic Web Health Care and Life Sciences Interest Group (HCLSIG) aims to help life scientists tap the potential benefits of using Semantic Web technology by developing use cases and applying standard Semantic Web specifications to healthcare and life sciences problems."

"One area where the group will likely apply its efforts is to finding ways to make existing life science and healthcare vocabularies and ontologies work within a Semantic Web context. Making existing data Semantic Web-aware will make it easier to access, find, and share that information. And once the information is in a Semantic Web format, “people will start seeing the benefits as they will be able to stitch together data,” said Miller."

redux [05.28.02]
Wired News A Map That Maps Gene Functions

"The genetics revolution is generating such a gigantic glut of information that artificial intelligence may be the only way scientists will ever put it to practical use.

Inspired by an AI effort to record all of the common-sense knowledge shared among humans called Cyc, scientists have come up with a technology that can gather all of the information scientists know about an organism."

redux [09.19.01]
GenomeWeb Paper Calls for Broader Use of AI-Based Methods in Bioinformatics

"Future understanding of genomic data may be severely limited unless bioinformaticists gain a better understanding of knowledge representation, according to Peter Karp, director of SRI International's Bioinformatics Research Group."

"As biological research grows more and more dependent on information technology to make sense of increasing amounts of genomic data, Karp wrote, it will be crucial for bioinformaticists to keep up with new developments in symbolic computing. "The genome revolution is increasing the need for pathway databases in the biological sciences, and similar developments will occur in other sciences. However, effective implementation of this paradigm is hampered because most biologists (and most other scientists) receive essentially no education in databases or knowledge representation."

redux [08.19.01]
Stanford Medical Informatics Preprint Archive Management of Data, Knowledge, and Metadata on the Semantic Web: Experience with a Pharmacogenetics Knowledge Base

"Biomedical researchers are decoding the human genome with astonishing speed, but the clinical significance of the massive volumes of data collected remains largely undiscovered. Progress requires communication and data sharing among scientists. These data may be in the form of (1) raw data, derived data, and inferences that result from computational analyses, or (2) text documents published by experts who present their conclusions in natural language. The World Wide Web provides a valuable infrastructure for enabling researchers to share the rapidly growing knowledge about biology and medicine, and a fully functional Semantic Web is necessary to support data submission and retrieval, the sharing of knowledge, and interoperation of related resources."

redux [05.10.00]
The XML Cover Pages XML and Semantic Transparency

"We may rehearse this fundamental axiom of descriptive markup in terms of a classical SGML polemic: the doubly-delimited information objects in an SGML/XML document are described by markup in a meaningful, self-documenting way through the use of names which are carefully selected by domain experts for element type names, attribute names, and attribute values. This is true of XML in 1998, was true of SGML in 1986, and was true of Brian Reid's Scribe system in 1976. However, of itself, descriptive markup proves to be of limited relevance as a mechanism to enable information interchange at the level of the machine.

As enchanting as it is to contemplate the apparent 'semantic' clarity, flexibility, and extensibility of XML vis--vis HTML (e.g., how wonderfully perspicuous XML <bookTitle> seems when compared to HTML <i>), we must reckon with the cold fact that XML does not of itself enable blind interchange or information reuse. XML may help humans predict what information might lie "between the tags" in the case of <trunk> </trunk>, but XML can only help. For an XML processor, <trunk> and <i> and <booktitle> are all equally (and totally) meaningless. Yes, meaningless .

Just like its parent metalanguage (SGML), XML has no formal mechanism to support the declaration of semantic integrity constraints, and XML processors have no means of validating object semantics even if these are declared informally in an XML DTD. XML processors will have no inherent understanding of document object semantics because XML (meta-)markup languages have no predefined application-level processing semantics. XML thus formally governs syntax only - not semantics."

The Rand Corporation : Scaffolding the New Web: Standards and Standards Policy for the Digital Economy The Emerging Challenge of Common Semantics

"With XML has come a proliferation of consortia from every industry imagineable to populate structured material with standard terms (see Appendix B). By one estimate, a new industry consortium is founded every week, perhaps one in four of which can collect serious membership dues. Rising in concert are intermediary groups to provide a consistent dictionary in cyberspace, in which each consortium's words are registered and catalogued.

Having come so far with a syntactic standard, XML, will E-commerce and knowledge organization stall out in semantic confusion?"

"How are semantic standards to come about?"

SemanticWeb.Org Tutorial on Knowledge Markup Techniques

"There is an increasing demand for formalized knowledge on the Web. Several communities (e.g. in bioinformatics and educational media) are getting ready to offer semiformal or formal Web content. XML-based markup languages provide a 'universal' storage and interchange format for such Web-distributed knowledge representation. This tutorial introduces techniques for knowledge markup: we show how to map AI representations (e.g., logics and frames) to XML (incl. RDF and RDF Schema), discuss how to specify XML DTDs and RDF (Schema) descriptions for various representations, survey existing XML extensions for knowledge bases/ontologies, deal with the acquisition and processing of such representations, and detail selected applications. After the tutorial, participants will have absorbed the theoretical foundation and practical use of knowledge markup and will be able to assess XML applications and extensions for AI. Besides bringing to bear existing AI techniques for a Web-based knowledge markup scenario, the tutorial will identify new AI research directions for further developing this scenario."